Friday, April 10, 2009

Save the Planet, Spare the People

Moderation, acceptance, open-mindedness; all these have been the themes of our discussion. Wherever our discussions have taken us these three themes reoccur. When we spoke about evolution we talked about reconciling science and religion, when we spoke about different religions we talked about accepting differences, opening our minds to new ideas, and being willing to accept the truth of different faiths. These three things seem to have been the answer to all of the conflicts of opinion we’ve run into in our discussions. Why? They’re the solution because they solve human animosity, they don’t feed it, they don’t try to repress it. Moderation, acceptance, and open-mindedness calmly and effectively neutralize human animosity.
When Francis Bacon justified tormenting the earth he was neither moderate, accepting nor open-minded. When other men said that what they wanted was more important than the earth that provided those means weren't moderate, accepting or open-minded. It’s important that people get what they need to live, but brutalizing the earth we were given stewardship over in the name of want is another thing entirely.
Moderation: as the people of this planet learn to be content with getting what they need, maybe a few luxuries, and are content with that, the waste of earth’s resources will plummet. Eating until you’re gorged, or the gallon challenge illustrate wasteful practices of the American people. We’re so used to having so much that we’ve become almost indifferent to wasting it. I’m not blameless, but I’m working on changing my ways, and I hope that as I change I can help others change too. By being moderate in thought and consumption we’ll not only be more content, but be more willing to give to our earth and others.
Acceptance: People are starving in African, as well as in America. People are starving no matter where you go, but this doesn’t mean that people shouldn’t do anything about it. In accepting something you commit yourself to taking action, or at least encouraging action. When I accept money from someone else I’m committing to using it. When people become willing to accept differences in the human race they become committed to doing something about those differences – in a constructive way. When we learn to accept each other we become able to work together.
Open-minded: When people are excessive and not willing to accept different views they become like an idea quarantine. Nothing goes in or out. While this preserves what they have, they lose more than they gain. Just as eliminating the wolves of Yellowstone caused dramatic effects in the ecosystem, getting rid of all ideas we see as not being directly beneficial cause the ecosystem of thought to degenerate. We need to keep an open-mind, a cautious open-mind, but an open mind.
As the human race learns moderation , acceptance, and to be open-minded, we’ll be able to live peaceably with one another, which will lead us to being able to live peaceably with the earth we’ve been given to live on.

8 comments:

  1. I like the way you laid out this blog, and I feel your points are relevant. I have noticed that our discussions in class are often spoken in generalities, but I have been impressed to hear many of us moving away from blaming the world at large for the lack of conservation or ability to execute moderation, but rather come full circle and realize that the war is individual. We will ultimately be judged for our decisions individually, so I hope that we can all come out of this class with a greater personal convection to improve our impact on the beautiful world around us.
    Thanks for your post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also agree that our discussion in class and this blog have revolved around these three subjects. I guess we all have to work better at being open-minded, moderate and more accepting of other opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Its true, noboby every changed anything by laying blame on others. It is us personally that have to change, and by us making a change hopefully others will notice also and commit to a better life

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that we ought to strive to avoid being dogmatic about our beliefs, and the beliefs of others. This weekend I had a discussion with my grandmother-in-law who is very set in her ways. It reminded me of the importance of being tolerant and open-minded.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My only caution here is that being open-minded does not mean being indulgent of every lifestyle. I think in many ways the problems we face are due to a lack of taboos. We've become too accepting of every lifestyle, even those which are contrary to the plan of happiness and hurt others. We need to make changes and stand up for old fashioned values at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very well organized post. I to agree that the three components of your blog have been the core of out discussion in class. This class has really openned my eyes to other religions and how they view the earth. Thank you for you post

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tootallstrupp's comment above was me: ScottSmithDDS; my wife must not have signed off

    ReplyDelete
  8. Moderation is a great thing, but I do not think that we should do anything extreme. When we live in moderation do we stop using paper goods and plastic utensils? Do we stop eating out? Avoid entertainment? Forgo big meals? Living in moderation is a good thing, but we must be careful not to go all the way to being Amish (Not that there is anything wrong with that!). We can be ourselves, but be our better selves.

    ReplyDelete